Our planes are full,” said Pedro Cardenas, a city commissioner in Brownsville, Texas, just north of Matamoros, as recent arrivals headed to locations across the U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody, the official said. official reported the Border Patrol stopped some 10,000 migrants on Tuesday - nearly twice the level from March and only slightly below the 11,000 figure that authorities have said is the upper limit of what they expect after Title 42 ends. By Thursday evening, the flow seemed to be slowing in some locations, but it was not clear why, or whether crossings would increase again after the coronavirus-related restrictions expire.Ī U.S. It was not clear how many migrants were on the move or how long the surge might last. side of the river, many surrendered immediately to authorities and hoped to be released while pursuing their cases in backlogged immigration courts, which takes years. They had little hope of a different result Thursday. Last week, Barrios and his friends entered the U.S. “What are we going to do, wait until they kill us?” “We don’t have any money left, we don’t have food, we don’t have a place to stay, the cartel is pursuing us,” said Barrios, whose wife was in U.S. “I don’t know what’s going to happen tomorrow,” said Jhoan Daniel Barrios, a former military police officer from Venezuela as he paced with two friends along the the border in Ciudad Juárez, across from El Paso, Texas, looking for a chance to seek refuge in the U.S. For provisions addressing the finality of Court of Appeal decisions, see rules 8.264(b) (civil appeals), 8.366(b) (criminal appeals), 8.490 (proceedings for writs of mandate, certiorari, and prohibition), and 8.1018(a) (transfer of appellate division cases).Many migrants were acutely aware of looming policy changes designed to stop illegal crossings and encourage asylum seekers to apply online and consider alternative destinations, including Canada or Spain. As used in article VI, section 12(a) and the rule, the term "cause" is broadly construed to include " 'all cases, matters, and proceedings of every description' " adjudicated by the Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court. The rule implements a portion of article VI, section 12(a) of the Constitution. Rule 8.552 applies only to causes that the Supreme Court transfers to itself for the purpose of reaching a decision on the merits. Rule 8.552 amended effective Janurepealed and adopted as rule 29.9 effective Janupreviously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007. Transfer under this rule requires a Supreme Court order signed by at least four justices an order denying transfer may be signed by the Chief Justice alone. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2007.) The petition and any answer must conform to the relevant provisions of rule 8.504. Within 20 days after the petition is filed, any party may serve and file an answer. The Supreme Court will not order transfer under this rule unless the cause presents an issue of great public importance that the Supreme Court must promptly resolve.Ī party seeking transfer under this rule must promptly serve and file in the Supreme Court a petition explaining how the cause satisfies the requirements of (c). (Subd (b) amended effective Janupreviously amended effective January 1, 2007.) Any cause pending in the Court of Appeal remains pending until the decision of the Court of Appeal is final in that court. On a party's petition or its own motion, the Supreme Court may transfer to itself, for decision, a cause pending in a Court of Appeal.įor purposes of this rule, a cause within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court is not pending in the Court of Appeal until that court orders it transferred under rule 8.1002.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |